Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Colorado Natural Resources, Energy and Environmental Law Review
Journal Abbreviation
Colo. Nat. Resources Energy & Env't L. Rev.
Abstract
The protection of federally owned wild lands, including but not limited to designated wilderness areas, has long been a cardinal element of the American character. For a variety of reasons, designating wild lands for protection under the Wilderness Act has proved difficult, increasingly so in recent years. Thus, attention has focused on undesignated wild lands, that is, unroaded areas managed by the principal federal land managers, the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). These areas can benefit from a kind of de facto protected status if they are Forest Service areas that have been inventoried for wilderness suitability and not released to multiple use or are wilderness study areas managed by BLM. In the last two decades, considerable controversy has surrounded roadless areas in both national forests and BLM lands because protecting their wild land characteristics may foreclose development, such as oil and gas leasing or timber harvesting. Recently, the courts have settled longstanding litigation by upholding roadless rule protection in the national forests. But BLM wild land protection has remained more unsettled, as Congress recently rejected a Wild Lands Policy adopted by the Obama Administration. Despite this political setback, current policy is to survey and consider wild lands in all BLM land plans and project approvals. This promised consideration, however, leaves the fate of such lands in the hands of local BLM officials and to the political vicissitudes of future administrations.
First Page
1
Last Page
59
Publication Date
2014
Recommended Citation
Michael Blumm & Andrew B. Erickson,
Federal Wild Lands Policy in the Twenty-First Century: What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been,
25
Colo. Nat. Resources Energy & Env't L. Rev.
1
(2014).
Available at:
https://lawcommons.lclark.edu/faculty_articles/44