Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Environmental Law

Abstract

This article traces the evolution of the public trust doctrine in Western water law. It claims that the doctrine is best understood through the remedies courts have prescribed concerning trust violations. Although there are four distinct categories of remedies in the case law, all promote either public access to trust resources or to decisionmakers who allocate them. Thus, according to the article, the public trust doctrine is a democratizing force - preventing monopolization of trust resources and requiring decisionmaking that is accountable to the public. The article predicts that state courts will continue to expand the public trust doctrine, relying especially on state constitutional provisions declaring water to be publicly owned. Finally, the article responds criticisms of the public trust doctrine by Professor Huffman by maintaining that the doctrine is a coherent body of law providing a necessary complement to prior appropriation principles, is not inconsistent with takings jurisprudence, and has sufficient grounding in state constitutions and statutes to continue to infuse public concerns into Western water law decisionmaking in the years ahead.

First Page

573

Last Page

604

Publication Date

1989

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.