•  
  •  
 

Lewis & Clark Law Review

Authors

First Page

425

Abstract

The sending and receiving of explicit images via cellular phone—popularly referred to as “sexting”—has emerged as a common method of sexual expression in the digital age. Though sexting is a relatively accepted practice among adults, society views sexting among minors as a significant threat to the health and well-being of young people. In an effort to curb the practice, many states have sought to prosecute minors engaged in sexting under existing child pornography laws. Subjecting children to far-reaching social, professional, and psychological harms at the hands of the criminal justice system is justified, proponents argue, because we must protect children from their own lack of judgment. Prosecuting children as child pornographers, however, has proven to be an ineffective and overly punitive remedy for a problem that is but a symptom of wider societal issues. Consequently, a comprehensive effort among parents, policymakers, prosecutors, and other adult stakeholders is needed to develop a remedy that furthers policy goals while protecting the interests of the child.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.