The Appointments Clause, Innovative Federalism, and the Constitutionality of the Northwest Power Planning Council
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Journal of Energy Law and Policy
Journal Abbreviation
J. Energy L. & Pol'y
Abstract
This paper, written shortly after the Ninth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the Northwest Planning Council, which Congress authorized to implement the Northwest Power Act, analyzed the court's decision. The paper reviewed the unsuccessful attempts to challenge the Council (thereby undermining its power planning and fish and wildlife programs) as violating the compact and appointments clauses of the Constitution as well as several alleged statutory infirmities. The paper concluded that the Ninth Circuit's decision was entirely consistent with the Supreme Court's then-recent decision in Bowsher v. Synar, which upheld the 1985 Balanced Budget Act (popularly known as Graham-Rudman-Hollings Act).
First Page
1
Last Page
26
Publication Date
1987
Recommended Citation
Michael Blumm,
The Appointments Clause, Innovative Federalism, and the Constitutionality of the Northwest Power Planning Council,
8
J. Energy L. & Pol'y
1
(1987).
Available at:
https://lawcommons.lclark.edu/faculty_articles/84