•  
  •  
 

Lewis & Clark Law Review

First Page

53

Abstract

In this Article, I present new evidence that African-Americans face unique impediments in obtaining access to counsel. Using a randomized audit design, I show that those with black-sounding names receive only half the callbacks of those with white-sounding names in response to requests for legal representation. I design a larger, follow-up experiment to evaluate variations on the theory of “statistical discrimination”—that lawyers are merely responding to economically relevant signals correlated with race. I find no evidence supporting the expectations of the statistical discrimination theory but some evidence that racial preferences matter. I conclude by presenting a more nuanced theory of racialized service rationing that is consistent with the body of experimental evidence presented and is supported by observational data. I discuss the implications of these theories for potential policy responses, including debates about affirmative action and the size of the legal profession.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.