•  
  •  
 

Lewis & Clark Law Review

Author Details

Mary Margaret L. Kirchner, J.D. 2021, Lewis & Clark Law School.

First Page

649

Abstract

Capital punishment is controversial in American society. It is the junction where moral standards and punishment for the most severe crimes crash together head on. As society has evolved, so have the expectations, requirements, and norms for capital punishment. In the history of the United States, capital punishment, commonly referred to as the death penalty, has been plagued with continuous inequalities. Based on the evolving standards of decency that shift as society matures, certain practices affiliated with the death penalty have now been invalidated as cruel and unusual. One of the most concerning flaws surrounding the death penalty is its unequal and disproportionate application to people of color. The inequalities of the death penalty have resurfaced in society’s discussion of the criminal justice system in the wake of the racial justice reckoning that exploded after the murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery. The morality of the death penalty has also been called into question in response to Attorney General William Barr’s announcement in July 2019 that the federal government would restart federal executions. Between Barr’s announcement and President Joseph Biden’s inauguration, the federal government executed 13 people. In Attorney General Barr’s initial announcement, five inmates were named to be executed. Lezmond Mitchell was one of the five initially named defendants. He was the only Native American on federal death row. Lezmond Mitchell was executed on August 26, 2020, by lethal injection. His sentencing and execution raise attention to the tumultuous, historically oppressive, and tarnished relationship between the federal government and the Native American Tribes. His execution stands as a symbol for the disregard the federal government has continuously practiced regarding tribal sovereignty and the related promises that it has made to the tribes. Mitchell’s execution also elucidates the crossing point between unequal racial practices within the criminal justice system, criminal jurisdiction, and criminal justice under Federal Indian Law, and the loopholes the federal government has implemented in order to strip tribes of their sovereignty.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.