Lewis & Clark Law Review
First Page
303
Abstract
Engaging with the methodological framework endorsed by the Supreme Court’s holding and rejected by the dissents in Bostock v. Clayton County, this Comment critically examines both the limited scope and potential misuses of the Court’s decision recognizing protection against employment discrimination for gay, lesbian, and transgender individuals under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Recommended Citation
James E. Rehwaldt,
Trojan Zebra: Unmasking Bostock’s Potential to Undermine LGBTQ+ Protections,
26
Lewis & Clark L. Rev.
303
(2022).
Available at:
https://lawcommons.lclark.edu/lclr/vol26/iss1/10
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons