International Animal Rights: Speciesism and Exclusionary Human Dignity

Authors

Kyle Ash

Author Details

Kyle Ash, M.A. candidate in Global Environmental Policy, American University

First Page

195

Abstract

The primary goal of this paper is to act as a heuristic device, to suggest an unconventional but practical perspective on the evolution of international law. Upon surveying discourse on the history of international law, texts of treaties, and declarations and writings of influential philosophers of law and morality, an antiquated perspective of humanity is apparent. A convention in international law, and a reflection of a common idea which feeds the foreboding trend of how humans relate to the planet, treats humanity as distinctively separate from the Earth’s biodiversity. Though environmental law is beginning to recognize the necessity of conserving biodiversity, a subjugating conceptualization of other species has inhibited the development, application, and legitimacy of the principle of sustainability. The belittling view of other species in relation to ourselves also creates inconsistencies within international law and undermines the integrity and sophistication of its development. International human rights law is especially affected.

Recommended Citation

Kyle Ash, International Animal Rights: Speciesism and Exclusionary Human Dignity, 11 Animal L. Rev. 195 (2005).
Available at: https://lawcommons.lclark.edu/alr/vol11/iss1/8