Animal Law Review
First Page
177
Abstract
Ms. Tresl examines the constitutionality of hunter harassment laws. When a five-step doctrinal analysis is applied to hunter harassment statutes, it is clear that the statutes are content-based and subject to the strictest of scrutiny. Because the statutes fail the strict scrutiny test, they therefore violate the American citizenry’s First Amendment right to free expression.
Recommended Citation
Jacqueline Tresl,
Shoot First, Talk Later: Blowing Holes in Freedom of Speech,
8
Animal L. Rev.
177
(2002).
Available at:
https://lawcommons.lclark.edu/alr/vol8/iss1/8
COinS