•  
  •  
 

Animal Law Review

First Page

241

Abstract

Using a feminist theoretical perspective and drawing on exam­ples from Canada and the United States, this Article considers the promises and pitfalls of language and narrative in the con­text of animal advocacy efforts. Because the animal advocacy movement faces an uphill battle on a number of fronts, leverag­ing language and narrative more conscientiously can help en­hance its success. Elucidating the equivocal nature of the premises on which our current social and legal conceptualiza­tion of nonhuman animals lies can prompt a shift in the domi­nant modes of thjnking about nonhuman animals, thereby stimulating meaningful change in their treatment. However, it is not only the message that matters, but also how that mes­sage is conveyed. Narratives offer a potentially more compas­sionate, less antagonistic way of drawing attention to nonhuman animal sufferi.ng in order to trigger an interruption in established ways of thinking that posit that nonhuman ani­mals are outside of the realm of moral considerability and, therefore, outside the bounds of legal protection.

Included in

Animal Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.