Animal Law Review
First Page
221
Abstract
Mr. McGovern discusses the reasoning behind the leap from patentability of non-living things to the living thing~ within the last twenty years. He concludes that neither the Supreme Court or Court of Customs and Patent Appeals has offered a convincing rationale for the inclusion of living things within 35 U.S.C. Section 101.
Recommended Citation
Matthew McGovern,
Biotechnology and the Patenting of Living Organisms,
3
Animal L. Rev.
221
(1997).
Available at:
https://lawcommons.lclark.edu/alr/vol3/iss1/17